- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
‘Many Minds’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):159-88 (1996)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
‘Many Minds’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Michael Lockwood - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):159-188.
‘Many Minds’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Replies to Replies.Michael Lockwood - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):445-461.
Probability and nonlocality in many minds interpretations of quantum mechanics.Meir Hemmo & Itamar Pitowsky - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):225-243.
Comment on 'many minds' interpretations of quantum mechanics by Michael lockwood”.David Deutsch - unknown
Whither the Minds?Jeremy Butterfield - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):200-221.
The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. [REVIEW]Andrew Lugg - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):449-452.
Review of Peter Mittelstaedt: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. [REVIEW]Douglas Kutach - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):649-651.
Review of J. A. Barrett, The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds. [REVIEW]Wayne Myrvold - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (3):536-38.
The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Michael Audi. [REVIEW]Andrew Lugg - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):449-452.
The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective.Lawrence Sklar - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):332-332.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
443 (#46,414)
6 months
43 (#107,904)
2009-01-28
Downloads
443 (#46,414)
6 months
43 (#107,904)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Everett and structure.David Wallace - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):87-105.
Understanding Deutsch's probability in a deterministic universe.Hilary Greaves - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):423-456.
On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many‐worlds interpretation of quantum theory.Lev Vaidman - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):245 – 261.
Worlds in the Everett interpretation.David Wallace - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (4):637-661.
Epistemology quantized: Circumstances in which we should come to believe in the Everett interpretation.David Wallace - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (4):655-689.
References found in this work
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 1987 - In John Stewart Bell (ed.), Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II.David Bohm - 1952 - Physical Review (85):166-193.
Interpreting the many-worlds interpretation.David Albert & Barry Loewer - 1988 - Synthese 77 (November):195-213.
On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory.H. D. Zeh - 1970 - Foundations of Physics 1 (1):69-76.
Mind, brain, and the quantum: the compound 'I'.Michael Lockwood - 1989 - New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo