- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
In John Stewart Bell (ed.), Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
| original | Bell, J. S. (1964) "On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox". \em Physics 1():195-200 |
My notes
Similar books and articles
The physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.B. H. Kellett - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Reexamined.Gen-Ichiro Nagasaka - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970:437 - 445.
A relativistic formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.Gerrit J. Smith & Robert Weingard - 1987 - Foundations of Physics 17 (2):149-171.
On Aerts' overlooked solution to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi - 2019 - In Diederik Aerts, Dalla Chiara, Maria Luisa, Christian de Ronde & Decio Krause (eds.), Probing the meaning of quantum mechanics: information, contextuality, relationalism and entanglement: Proceedings of the II International Workshop on Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Information: Physical, Philosophical and Logical Approaches, CLEA, Brussels. New Jersey: World Scientific.
Separable hidden variables theory to explain Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
A new approach to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.Tirzah Kaufherr - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (10):1043-1051.
Sharp and the refutation of the Einstein, podolsky, Rosen paradox.C. A. Hooker - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):224-233.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-16
Downloads
2 (#1,949,672)
6 months
2 (#1,730,672)
2014-01-16
Downloads
2 (#1,949,672)
6 months
2 (#1,730,672)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Quantum holism: nonseparability as common ground.Jenann Ismael & Jonathan Schaffer - 2020 - Synthese 197 (10):4131-4160.
Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures.Patrick Suppes - 2002 - CSLI Publications (distributed by Chicago University Press).
Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination (1981).William C. Wimsatt - 2012 - In Lena Soler (ed.), Characterizing the robustness of science: after the practice turn in philosophy of science. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 61-78.
Independence, invariance and the causal Markov condition.Daniel M. Hausman & James Woodward - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):521-583.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-ff2nm uwo