Utile Et Dulce : a response to Noël Carroll

Abstract

In response to Noël Carroll's criticisms of my essay on C. I. Lewis's conception of aesthetic experience, I discuss reasons given in support of axiological accounts of aesthetic experience, including Lewis's contentions about the intrinsic valence of all experiences and his emphasis on the interests motivating philosophical classifications of experience. I also respond to Carroll's remarks about a possible explanatory requirement on a conception of aesthetic experience and the idea that artists have aesthetic experiences as they make a work of art.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Utile et dulce: A response to noël Carroll.Paisley Nathan Livingston - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):274-281.
Carroll's bones.Robert Stecker - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):282-286.
Characterizing Aesthetic Experience.Haewan Lee - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:161-167.
Scratching an Itch.Sherri Irvin - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (1):25-35.
C. I. Lewis and the outlines of aesthetic experience.Paisley Nathan Livingston - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):378-392.
Aesthetic experience and the revelation of value.Jeffrey Petts - 2000 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (1):61-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-02

Downloads
28 (#557,374)

6 months
8 (#505,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paisley Livingston
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references