A theory of sexual revolution: explaining the collapse of the norm of premarital abstinence

Mind and Society 20 (1):41-58 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sexual revolution that took place in the late 1960s and early 1970s is one of the most profound social changes during the second half of the twentieth century in America. Before the revolution, there existed a norm proscribing premarital sex (PS norm); premarital sex was not accepted. After the sexual revolution, the PS norm no longer existed; premarital sex became accepted. In the literature on how premarital sex became accepted, little attention is given to the institutional change that transpired—the collapse of a sexual norm. This study specifies one micro-mechanism of this social change. Specifically, adopting methodological individualism and the prisoner's dilemma game, I develop a theory that explains how a technological innovation for contraception triggered a change in individuals' perception of premarital sex, which led to their behavioral change. As a result, premarital sex became accepted, and the norm proscribing premarital sex collapsed. I use General Social Survey data to test the hypothesized micro-mechanism of the institutional change. The empirical analysis supports the hypothesis derived from the theory. Based on the above analyses, I discuss two alternative explanations and the issue of teenage pregnancy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Social Context of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness.Ira L. Reiss - 1967 - New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Premarital Sex and Exploitation in a Liberal Society.David Gilboa - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):55-67.
Campus Orientation.Michael Bruce & Robert M. Stewart - 2010-09-24 - In Fritz Allhoff, Michael Bruce & Robert M. Stewart (eds.), College Sex ‐ Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 1–14.
Mistaken Expressions.Joshua Gert - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):459-479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-03

Downloads
24 (#679,414)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chien-Ling Liu
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations