Discussion – epistemic options [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 121 (2):147 - 158 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bas van Fraassen wants to be an empiricist, but he is deeply dissatisfied with traditional versions of empiricism. So he is developing a new approach: epistemological voluntarism. Let me be blunt. Van Fraassen is an outstanding philosopher, and his new epistemology is important. But The Empirical Stance is a difficult book, because voluntarism is a difficult position to articulate. In what follows I attempt to clarify the situation a little, or at least to explain why it resists clarification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Norms of epistemic diversity.Miriam Solomon - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):23-36.
Deontology in ethics and epistemology.Anthony Robert Booth - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):530-545.
The epistemic demands of environmental virtue.Jason Kawall - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (1-2):109-28.
Review: Discussion: Epistemic Options. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):147 - 158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
133 (#137,521)

6 months
4 (#775,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Stance Pluralism, Scientology and the Problem of Relativism.Ragnar van der Merwe - forthcoming - Foundations of Science: DOI: 10.1007/s10699-022-09882-w.
I—The Virtues of Relativism.Maria Baghramian - 2019 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93 (1):247-269.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references