On salmon's attempt to redesign the design argument

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (2):77 - 84 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00135819

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Farming salmon ethically.E. A. Needham & Hugh Lehman - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):78-81.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Anthropocentrism and the design argument.Neil A. Manson - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
Possibilities and the arguments for origin essentialism.Teresa Robertson - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):729-750.
A note on Kripke's footnote 56 argument for the essentiality of origin.Ross P. Cameron - 2005 - Ratio 18 (3):262-275.
The unimportance of being random.Michael J. White - 1988 - Synthese 76 (1):171 - 178.
Anthropic reasoning and the contemporary design argument in astrophysics: A reply to Robert Klee.Mark Walker & Milan M. Cirkovic - unknown
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 117–147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#372,141)

6 months
7 (#416,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The design argument, cosmic “fine tuning,” and the anthropic principle.John Jefferson Davis - 1987 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22 (3):139 - 150.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Religion and science: A new look at Hume's dialogues.Wesley C. Salmon - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 33 (2):143 - 176.
God and Probability.D. H. Mellor - 1969 - Religious Studies 5 (2):223 - 234.

Add more references