What is (or at least appears to be) wrong with intuitionistic logic?

In Georg Schurz (ed.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. pp. 173-186 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz's logic.Wolfgang Lenzen - 2004 - In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier. pp. 3--1.
Epistemic logic.Wolfgang Lenzen - 2004 - In M. Sintonen, J. Wolenski & I. Niiniluoto (eds.), Handbook of Epistemology. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 963--983.
S4.1.4=S4.1.2 and S4.021=S4.04.Wolfgang Lenzen - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):465-466.
S4:1:4 = s4:1:2 and s4:021 = s4:04.Wolfgang Lenzen - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (July):465-466.
Leibniz's calculus of strict implication.Wolfgang Lenzen - 1987 - In Jan T. J. Srzednicki (ed.), Initiatives in Logic. M. Nijhoff. pp. 1--35.
Doxastic logic and the Burge-Buridan-paradox.Wolfgang Lenzen - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (1):43 - 49.
A rare accident.Wolfgang Lenzen - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (2):249-250.
Recent work in epistemic logic.Wolfgang Lenzen - 1978 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 30:1-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-25

Downloads
13 (#1,028,363)

6 months
3 (#968,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references