- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The effect of introspection on judgment and decision making is dependent on the quality of conscious thinking
Consciousness and Cognition 42 (C):340-351 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
When good evidence goes bad: The weak evidence effect in judgment and decision-making.Philip M. Fernbach, Adam Darlow & Steven A. Sloman - 2011 - Cognition 119 (3):459-467.
Introspecting a conscious decision or the consciousness of a decision?Alessandro Antonietti - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1916-1917.
Using Choice Blindness to Study Decision Making and Introspection.Petter Johansson & Lars Hall - 2008 - In Peter Gärdenfors & Annika Wallin (eds.), Cognition - A Smorgasbord. pp. 267-283.
Introspection distinct from first-order experiences.Morten Overgaard & T. A. Sorenson - 2004 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (7-8):11--7.
Good Moral Judgment and Decision‐Making Without Deliberation.Asia Ferrin - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):68-95.
Evidence for feedback dependent conscious awareness of action.Sukhvinder S. Obhi - 2007 - Brain Research 1161:88-94.
The affective Simon effect: How Automatic? How conscious?K. Duscherer & D. Holender - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):S71 - S71.
Interactive capacity, decisional capacity, and a dilemma for surrogates.Vanessa Carbonell - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (4):36-37.
The Collapsing Choice Theory: Dissociating Choice and Judgment in Decision Making. [REVIEW]Jeffrey M. Stibel, Itiel E. Dror & Talia Ben-Zeev - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (2):149-179.
Contractualist tendencies and reasoning in moral judgment and decision making.Arthur Le Pargneux, Nick Chater & Hossam Zeitoun - 2024 - Cognition 249 (C):105838.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-12-09
Downloads
15 (#946,317)
6 months
3 (#1,206,449)
2016-12-09
Downloads
15 (#946,317)
6 months
3 (#1,206,449)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (3):231-59.
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson - 1977 - Psychological Review; Psychological Review 84 (3):231.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):645-665.
Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task.Petter Johansson, Lars Hall, Sverker Sikstrom & Andreas Olsson - 2005 - Science 310 (5745):116-119.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo