Paradox by (non-wellfounded) definition

Analysis 65 (4):275–278 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00566.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The definition of `pragmatic paradox'.Frank B. Ebersole - 1953 - Mind 62 (245):80-85.
A diagram of definition: the defining of definition.Alexander Matthews - 1998 - Assen: Van Gorcum.
A dichotomic analysis of the surprise examination paradox.Paul Franceschi - 2002
Paradox and Mystery in Theology.Bruce P. Baugus - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (2):238-251.
Moore’s Paradox is not just another pragmatic paradox.Timothy Chan - 2010 - Synthese 173 (3):211 - 229.
An algebraic study of well-foundedness.Robert Goldblatt - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (4):423 - 437.
What is a self-referential sentence? Critical remarks on the alleged mbox(non-)circularity of Yablo's paradox.Hannes Leitgeb - 2002 - Logique and Analyse 177 (178):3-14.
The concept of strong and weak virtual reality.Andreas Martin Lisewski - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):201-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
157 (#121,271)

6 months
12 (#213,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hannes Leitgeb
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradox without Self-Reference.Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Analysis 53 (4):251-252.
Yablo’s paradox.Graham Priest - 1997 - Analysis 57 (4):236–242.
Patterns of paradox.Roy T. Cook - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (3):767-774.
Is yablo’s paradox non-circular?J. Beall - 2001 - Analysis 61 (3):176–87.

View all 9 references / Add more references