Zika Virus: Can Artificial Contraception Be Condoned?

Internet Journal of Infectious Diseases 15 (1) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As the Zika virus pandemic continues to bring worry and fear to health officials and medical scientists, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended that residents of the Zika-infected countries, e.g., Brazil, and those who have traveled to the area should delay having babies which may involve artificial contraceptive, particularly condom. This preventive policy, however, is seemingly at odds with the Roman Catholic Church’s position on the contraceptive. As least since the promulgation of Paul VI’s 1968 encyclical, Humanae Vitae, the Church has explicitly condemned artificial birth control as intrinsic evil. However, the current pontiff, Pope Francis, during his recent visit to Latin America, remarked that the use of artificial contraception may not be in contradiction to the teaching of Humanae Vitae while drawing a parallel between the current Zika Crisis and the 1960’s Belgian Congo Nun Controversy. The pope mentioned that the traditional ethical principle of the lesser of two evils may be the doctrine that justified the exceptions. The authors of this paper attempt to expand the theological rationale of the pope’s suggestion. In so doing, the authors rely on casuistical reasoning as an analytic tool that compares the Belgian Congo Nun case and the given Zika case, and suggest that the former is highly similar to, if not the same as, the latter in terms of normative moral feature. That is, in both cases the use of artificial contraception is theologically justified in reference to the criteria that the doctrine of the lesser of two evils requires. The authors wish that the paper would provide a solid theological-ethical ground based on which condom-use as the most immediate and effective preventive measure can be recommended in numerous Catholic hospitals as well as among Catholic communities in the world, particularly the most Zika-affected and largest Catholic community in the world, Brazil – 123 million present Brazilian citizens are reported to be Roman Catholic.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zika virus.Dilinie Herbert - 2015 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 21 (2):12.
Humanae vitae' I: Pope Paul VI in pastoral mode.Joseph Parkinson - 2013 - The Australasian Catholic Record 90 (2):185.
Zika virus, women and ethics.Debora Diniz - 2016 - Developing World Bioethics 16 (2):62-63.
Ethics of health care: an introductory textbook.Benedict M. Ashley - 1994 - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Edited by Kevin D. O'Rourke.
Medical ethics: sources of Catholic teachings.Kevin D. O'Rourke & Philip Boyle (eds.) - 1993 - Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Ethical Principle in Catholic Health Care.Edward James Furton & Veronica McLoud Dort (eds.) - 1999 - National Catholic Bioethics Center.
Policy arguments in a public church: Catholic social ethics and bioethics.J. Bryan Hehir - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):347-364.
Health care ethics: a theological analysis.Benedict M. Ashley - 1997 - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Edited by Kevin D. O'Rourke.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-23

Downloads
406 (#48,964)

6 months
72 (#66,605)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ontic evil and moral evil.Louis Janssens - 2000 - In Christopher Robert Kaczor (ed.), Proportionalism: For and Against. Marquette University Press.

Add more references