Why Naming Disease Differs From Naming Illness

AMA Journal of Ethics 20 (12):E1195-1200 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Addressing the question of how medicine should engage with people who consider their clinical disease condition to be importantly constitutive of their identity, this article focuses on one group—advocates for the fat acceptance (FA) or body positivity movement in American society. Drawing on philosophical analysis, I try to show that FA and physician communities represent different traditions within the larger culture and that whether obesity should be considered a disease is a culture battle. I argue that diseases (medical) and illnesses (cultural) are 2 different designations of clinical symptoms and that both disease and illness designations can change over time or be uncertain.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-01

Downloads
63 (#89,047)

6 months
384 (#54,302)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marvin Lee
La Salle University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Religion as Conversation-stopper.Richard Rorty - 1994 - Common Knowledge 3 (1):1-6.

Add more references