10 found
Order:
  1.  41
    Epistemic Injustice and Psychiatric Classification.Anke Bueter - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1064-1074.
    This article supports calls for an increased integration of patients into taxonomic decision making in psychiatry by arguing that their exclusion constitutes a special kind of epistemic injustice: preemptive testimonial injustice, which precludes the opportunity for testimony due to a wrongly presumed irrelevance or lack of expertise. Here, this presumption is misguided for two reasons: the role of values in psychiatric classification and the potential function of first-person knowledge as a corrective means against implicitly value-laden, inaccurate, or incomplete diagnostic criteria (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  2.  28
    The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment.Anke Bueter - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:18-26.
  3.  33
    A Multi-Dimensional Pluralist Response to the DSM-Controversies.Anke Bueter - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (2):316-343.
    The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has elicited numerous criticisms throughout its history. Its particularly controversial status has not been resolved by the recent release of the DSM-5 ; rather, the new edition has amplified debates in psychiatry as well as philosophy and the wider public. To a certain extent, such controversies are to be expected because of the influential role the DSM plays in science and health care. Researchers have often been required to use the DSM classification (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  38
    Public Epistemic Trustworthiness and the Integration of Patients in Psychiatric Classification.Anke Bueter - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 19):4711-4729.
    Psychiatric classification, as exemplified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, is dealing with a lack of trust and credibility—in the scientific, but also in the public realm. Regarding the latter in particular, one possible remedial measure for this crisis in trust lies in an increased integration of patients into the DSM revision process. The DSM, as a manual for clinical practice, is forced to make decisions that exceed available data and involve value-judgments. Regarding such decisions, public epistemic (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5.  2
    Bias as an Epistemic Notion.Anke Bueter - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91:307-315.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  71
    Androcentrism, Feminism, and Pluralism in Medicine.Anke Bueter - 2017 - Topoi 36 (3):521-530.
    Gender-medicine has been very successful in discovering gaps in medical knowledge, disclosing biases in earlier research, and generating new results. It has superseded a more androcentric and sexist medicine. Yet, its development should not be understood in terms of a further approximation of value-freedom. Rather, it is a case of better value-laden science due to an enhanced pluralism in medicine and society. This interpretation is based on an account of the origins of gender-medicine in the feminist women’s health movement and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  12
    Introduction to the Special Issue on Philosophy of Medicine.Saana Jukola & Anke Bueter - 2021 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17 (2):(SI1)5-8.
    This article is an introduction to the special issue on philosophy of medicine. Philosophy of medicine is a field that has flourished in the last couple of decades and has become increasingly institutionalized. The introduction begins with a brief overview of some of the most central recent developments in the field. It then describes the six articles that comprise this issue.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  11
    Diagnostic Overshadowing in Psychiatric-Somatic Comorbidity: A Case for Structural Testimonial Injustice.Anke Bueter - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-21.
    People with mental illnesses have higher prevalence and mortality rates with regard to common somatic diseases and causes of death, such as cardio-vascular conditions or cancer. One factor contributing to this excess morbidity and mortality is the sub-standard level of physical healthcare offered to the mentally ill. In particular, they are often subject to diagnostic overshadowing: a tendency to attribute physical symptoms to a pre-existing diagnosis of mental illness. This might be seen as an unfortunate instance of epistemic bad luck, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  25
    On Illness, Disease, and Priority: A Framework for More Fruitful Debates.Anke Bueter - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (3):463-474.
    The distinction between ‘disease’ and ‘illness’ has played an important role in the debate between naturalism and normativism. Both employ these notions, yet disagree on whether to assign priority to ‘disease’ or ‘illness’. I argue that this discussion suffers from implicit differences in the underlying interpretations: While for naturalists the distinction between ‘disease’ and ‘illness’ is one between a descriptive and a prescriptive notion, for normativists it is one between cause and effect. This discrepancy is connected to different interpretations of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  21
    Dimensions of Inductive Risk: Prospects, Boundaries, New Facets.Anna Leuschner & Anke Bueter - 2018 - Science & Education 27 (5-6):581-588.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark