Writing and 'scientific discourse' in sociology

History of the Human Sciences 5 (1):63-71 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is writing a human science? Certainly it is not science as such, despite much specialist knowledge about its strategies, developed by scholarly research going back many years. But what are called the human sciences are not ’sciences’ either; they have simply followed in the wake of the natural sciences and used the same word. And yet it is precisely here, in the equivocal area opened up by the statement ’writing as a human science’, that one of the fundamental questions concerning the relationship of these ’sciences’ to writing is revealed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The possibility of a mathematical sociology of scientific communication.Loet Leydesdorff - 1996 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (2):243-265.
Toward a sociology of epistemic things.David Bloor - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (3):285-312.
Philosophical writing : prefacing as professing.Rob McCormack - 2008 - In Michael A. Peters (ed.), Educational Philosophy and Theory. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 832-855.
Rhetoric and realism.Rom Harré - 1996 - Theoria 11 (1):41-47.
The knowledge content of science and the sociology of scientific knowledge.Loet Leydesdorff - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (2):241-263.
On Writing.Zygmunt Bauman - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (1):79-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
84 (#199,701)

6 months
6 (#507,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references