Academic Freedom, Critical Thinking and Teaching Ethics

Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5 (2):199-208 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sketched in somewhat general terms, there are two basic ways of going about teaching ethics: the moral indoctrination approach, which is essentially a rote learning exercise; and the moral engagement approach, which emphasizes listening to others in an open-minded manner and coming to carefully considered conclusions only after thoughtful reflection about differing views concerning matters of controversy. For reasons both practical and philosophical, the second approach, which emphasizes the development of critical thinking skills, is vastly preferable. If the moral engagement approach is to work, however, it is essential that academic freedom for students in the classroom be ensured, for developing critical thinking skills is not possible if there is not freedom to think.The professor has the primary responsibility for maintaining a classroom environment in which students are comfortable giving expression to their views and for assisting students in the development of their critical thinking skills

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Lee
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cézanne's Doubt.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1964 - In Sense and Non-Sense. [Evanston, Ill.]: Northwestern University Press. pp. 1-25.

Add more references