What Does It Mean to Have a Meaning Problem? Meaning, Skill, and the Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 26 (3):35-50 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Psychotherapy is effective. Since the 1970’s, meta-analyses, and meta-analyses of meta-analyses, have consistently shown a significant effect size for psychotherapeutic interventions when compared to no treatment or placebo treatments. This effectiveness is normally taken as a sign of the scientific legitimization of clinical psychotherapy. A significant problem, however, is that most psychotherapies appear to be equally effective. This poses a problem for specific psychotherapies: they may work, but likely not for the reasons that ground their theoretical explanations for their effectiveness. A prominent explanation for the findings of common efficacy in psychotherapy is to postulate that all successful therapies work by altering maladaptive meanings and providing patients with new, more adaptive meanings. This paper argues that the ‘meaning view’ of psychological change is likely mistaken; psychological problems are not normally problems of meaning nor are they directly ameliorated by changes in meaning. This paper then outlines a skill-based explanation for the findings of the common efficacy of psychotherapy.

Similar books and articles

From medicine to psychotherapy: the placebo effect.Stewart Justman - 2011 - History of the Human Sciences 24 (1):95-107.
An Introduction to the Psychotherapies.Sidney Bloch (ed.) - 1986 - Oxford University Press USA.
Prescribing Psychotherapy.Margaret S. Chisolm - 2011 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (2):168-175.
Is the Current Practice of Psychotherapy Morally Permissible?Jason A. Beyer - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):85-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-11

Downloads
554 (#28,274)

6 months
183 (#11,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Garson Leder
Medical College of Wisconsin

Citations of this work

Framing the Epistemic Schism of Statistical Mechanics.Javier Anta - 2021 - Proceedings of the X Conference of the Spanish Society of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Material beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Why I Am Not a Cognitive Psychologist.B. F. Skinner - 1977 - Behavior and Philosophy 5 (2):1.

Add more references