Three theories of dialectic

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (2):316-318 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On three related extensions of S.R. A. Bull - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (4):330-334.
Equivalence Relations And S.G. E. Hughes - 1980 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (July):577-584.
${\rm S}4.6$ is ${\rm S}4.9$.J. Jay Zeman - 1972 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (1):118-118.
${\rm S}3.02={\rm S}3.03$.George F. Schumm - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):147-148.
C. S. S. Peirce and E. G. A. Husserl on the nature of logic.Albert A. Mullin - 1966 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7 (4):301-304.
The Guptα-Belnαp Systems S and S* are not Axiomatisable.Philip Kremer - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):583-596.
Varying modal theories.Th Lucas & R. Lavendhomme - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (3):389-402.
Degrees of isolic theories.Erik Ellentuck - 1973 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (3):331-340.
Classifications for inconsistent theories.John Grant - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):435-444.
S$1\deg$ and generalized S$5$-axioms. [REVIEW]Ivo Thomas - 1963 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 4 (2):153-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
19 (#791,096)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references