Rethinking the Three R’s in Animal Research: Replacement, Reduction, Refinement

Springer Verlag (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work challenges the current reliance on "The Three R's" or Replacement, Reduction and Refinement which direct most animal research in the behavioral sciences. The author argues that these principles that were developed in the 1950's to guide the use of animals in research studies are outdated. He suggests that the notions of refinement and reduction are often ill-defined and can be useful only in cases where replacement is impossible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why animal ethics committees don't work.Denise Russell - 2012 - Between the Species 15 (1).
Environmental Research Ethics.Howard J. Curzer, Mark Wallace & Gad Perry - 2013 - Environmental Ethics 35 (1):95-114.
Reassessing the Three Rs?Melanie Challenger - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):75-76.
Opportunities and Challenges in Applying the 3Rs to Zoos and Aquariums.Sabrina Brando & Mickey Gjerris - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (4):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-01

Downloads
4 (#1,642,475)

6 months
1 (#1,720,529)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references