Is the Primary-Language an Object-Language? Analysis of a Logico-Philosophical Assumption

Foundations of Language 1 (3):157-170 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Carnap and the Tractatus' Philosophy of Logic.Oskari Kuusela - 2012 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (3):1-25.
Is preadaptation for language a necessary assumption?David J. Bryant - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):183-184.
Language is an instrument for thought. Really?Jan Nuyts - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):317-333.
Language and Know-How.David Simpson - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):629–643.
Can a language have indenumerably many expressions?Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1983 - History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (1-2):73-82.
Sexist language: a modern philosophical analysis.Mary Vetterling-Braggin (ed.) - 1981 - Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-12

Downloads
8 (#1,318,910)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references