Who Uses the Cost-Benefit Rules of Choice? Implications

, &
In Richard E. Nisbett (ed.), Rules for Reasoning. L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 277 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Who uses the normative rules of choice.R. Larrick, R. Nisbett & J. Morgan - 1993 - In Richard E. Nisbett (ed.), Rules for Reasoning. L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 277--94.
Costs and Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Response to Bantz and MacLean.Peter Railton - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:261-271.
Review of Matthew D. Adler: Well-Being and Fair Distribution. Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. [REVIEW]Alex Voorhoeve - 2014 - Social Choice and Welfare 42 (1):245-54.
Cost-Benefit versus Expected Utility Acceptance Rules.Alex C. Michalos - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970 (1):375-402.
Cost-benefit analysis: legal, economic, and philosophical perspectives.Matthew D. Adler & Eric A. Posner (eds.) - 2001 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Natura economica in Environmental Valuation.Katrine Soma - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (1):31 - 50.
Flawed attacks on contemporary human rights: Laudan, Sunstein, and the cost-benefit state. [REVIEW]Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2005 - Human Rights Review 7 (1):92-110.
Desmond's non-NICE choice: dilemmas from drug-eluting stents in the affordability gap.Raj K. Mohindra & Jim A. Hall - 2006 - Clinical Ethics 1 (2):105-108.
Rules for reasoning.Richard E. Nisbett (ed.) - 1993 - Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Cost-Benefit Analyses of Transportation Investments — Neither critical nor realistic.Petter Næss - 2006 - Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1):32-60.
Response strategies in a two-choice reaction task with a continuous cost for time.Richard G. Swensson & Ward Edwards - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (1):67.
Ethical Issues in Environmental Decision Making and the Limitations of Cost/Benefit Analysis (CBA).Simon Glynn - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (1):27 - 39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
10 (#1,184,994)

6 months
4 (#779,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Advancing the rationality debate.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):701-717.
Adaptive Rationality, Biases, and the Heterogeneity Hypothesis.Andrea Polonioli - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (4):787-803.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references