Some Remarks on the Logic of Explanation

Philosophy of Science 25 (3):199 - 207 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These considerations on Carl G. Hempel's and Paul Oppenheim's lucid article “Studies in the Logic of Explanation'”—LE for short—are an attempt to exploit some of the considerable advances made there. I wish to show how these advances may be incorporated into a technique for the investigation of problems of the philosophy of science, which has been called discourse-analytic. This discipline consists essentially in a technique of examining actual texts provided by specialists, such as physicists, psychologists, historians, etc., the task being to discover fundamental logical and semantical features in the discourses under investigation. I am preparing a book on historical explanation, which will contain such case studies of historical texts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#633,195)

6 months
15 (#167,163)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Performatives and descriptions.Gerard A. Radnitzky - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):12 – 45.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
The function of general laws in history.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1942 - Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):35-48.
Readings in the Philosophy of Sci-ence.Herbert Feigl & May Brodbeck - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (26):175-175.
The Nature of Historical Explanation.Patrick Gardiner - 1954 - Philosophy 29 (108):86-87.

View all 10 references / Add more references