The completeness of systems and the behavioral repertoire

Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (4):391-403 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that behavior analysis is an actual or potential axiomatic system based upon the schedules of reinforcement which are behavioral, causative laws. Gödel proved that all axiomatic systems are complete or consistent, but not both at the same time. The point is made that behavior analysis is an incomplete, consistent system. The system's incompleteness is compensated for by the concept of the behavioral repertoire which, although in part lying outside of the axiomatic core of behavior analysis, both extends and strengthens it

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three logical theories.John Corcoran - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (2):153-177.
Repertoire Contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):1-21.
Finite models constructed from canonical formulas.Lawrence S. Moss - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):605 - 640.
The importance of physicalism in the philosophy of religion.Leonard Angel - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):141 - 156.
Completeness: from Gödel to Henkin.Maria Manzano & Enrique Alonso - 2014 - History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (1):1-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-27

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references