- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Thinking Big, Thinking Small: Smilansky's Paradoxes
Iyyun 58:277-291 (2009)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
To Study Thinking Logic in the Pre-Qin Period by Interpreting the Explanations of Hexagram of Tai and P1 and Their Order in Zhouyi.Ke-Feng Wu - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:126-132.
When a small difference makes a big difference: counterfactual thinking and luck.Karl Halvor Teigen - 2005 - In David R. Mandel, Denis J. Hilton & Patrizia Catellani (eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking. New York: Routledge.
The Ethics of Technology: From Thinking Big to Small—and Big Again.Carl Mitcham - 2020 - Axiomathes 30 (6):589-596.
Thinking Big in Dark Times.Drucilla Cornell - 2010 - In Roger Berkowitz (ed.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 219-228.
Developing Computational Thinking, “Fad” or “Fundamental”?Arnold Pears - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 14 (3):410-412.
Clarifying Forfeiture Theory in Response to Dempsey and Lang.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (2):215-222.
How We Fight: Ethics in War, edited by Helen Frowe and Gerald Lang. [REVIEW]Nathan L. Cartagena - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (4):487-490.
Some Paradoxes of Reflective Thinking.Nicholas Power - 1999 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 19 (2):106-113.
Arguing for our lives: a user's guide to constructive dialog.Robert Jensen - 2013 - San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-07-08
Downloads
263 (#10,863)
6 months
61 (#255,957)
2014-07-08
Downloads
263 (#10,863)
6 months
61 (#255,957)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How Interesting is the “Boring Problem” for Luck Egalitarianism?Gerald Lang - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (3):698-722.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-lc8fp uwo