Thinking about Brexit with Cristina Lafont

Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (1):62-64 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this comment on Cristina Lafont’s new book Democracy without Shortcuts, I apply some of her ideas to the Brexit case in order to show that her identification of problematic shortcuts has significant analytical potential when it comes to understanding contemporary challenges to democracy. I argue that the push for Brexit can be viewed as a response to ‘expertocratic’ shortcuts in European Union decision-making, while David Cameron’s attempt to resolve the conflict once and for all by referendum constituted a ‘proceduralist’ shortcut. I conclude by asking whether Lafont’s suggestion to ‘constitutionalize’ discourses and decisions could also imply seeking a meta-deliberative assessment of democratic institutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy without shortcuts.Cristina Lafont - 2019 - Constellations 26 (3):355-360.
Heidegger, Lafont and the necessity of the transcendental.R. Matthew Shockey - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (5):557-574.
Lottocracy and deliberative accountability.Hubertus Buchstein - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (1):40-44.
Heidegger, language, and world-disclosure.Cristina Lafont - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
6 (#1,443,383)

6 months
4 (#790,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references