Local Legal Strategies to Increase Vaccination During the COVID-19 Pandemic — Lessons from New York City

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (3):613-618 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Vaccine mandates played a critical role in the success of New York City’s COVID-19 response. By relying on evidence as a substantive basis for the mandates and adhering to procedural requirements and precedent, New York City leveraged its position and expertise as a local governmental authority to devise mandatory vaccine policies that withstood numerous legal challenges. New York City’s experience highlights the role of municipal government in mounting a meaningful public health response, and the strategies adopted by NYC may provide a blueprint for municipalities around the world facing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the threat of future public health emergencies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

COVID in NYC: What We Could Do Better.Tia Powell & Elizabeth Chuang - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (7):62-66.
Objectivity in the Historiography of COVID-19 Pandemic.Orhan Onder - 2022 - History and Philosophy of Medicine 4 (3):1-3.
62,406 and Counting.Nancy Berlinger - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):inside_front_cover-inside_front_.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
6 (#1,456,990)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Naomi Stark
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references