Hypo- or hyper-mentalizing: It all depends upon what one means by “mentalizing”

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (3):274-275 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By conceiving of autism and psychosis as diametrically opposite phenotypes of underactive and overactive mentalizing, respectively, Crespi & Badcock (C&B) commit themselves to a continuum view of intercorrelated mentalizing functions. This view fails to acknowledge dissociations between mentalizing functions and that psychotic people show a mixture of both hypo- and hyper-mentalizing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mentalizing and Religion.Hanneke Schaap-Jonker & Jozef M. T. Corveleyn - 2014 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 36 (3):303-322.
How I Know What You Know.Shannon Spaulding - 2024 - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Social Understanding without Mentalizing.Julian Kiverstein - 2011 - Philosophical Topics 39 (1):41-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
48 (#320,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Hearing God speak? Debunking arguments and everyday religious experiences.Lari Launonen - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2):187-203.

Add more citations