Evolving process-based models from psychological data using genetic programming
Abstract
The development of computational models to provide explanations of psychological data can be achieved using semi-automated search techniques, such as genetic programming. One challenge with these techniques is to control the type of model that is evolved to be cognitively plausible – a typical problem is that of “bloating”, where continued evolution generates models of increasing size without improving overall fitness. In this paper we describe a system for representing psychological data, a class of process-based models, and algorithms for evolving models. We apply this system to the delayed match-to-sample task. We show how the challenge of bloating may be addressed by extending the fitness function to include measures of cognitive performanceMy notes
Similar books and articles
Automatic Generation of Cognitive Theories using Genetic Programming.Enrique Frias-Martinez & Fernand Gobet - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (3):287-309.
Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2011 - Synthese 183 (3):313-338.
Games in the semantics of programming languages – an elementary introduction.Jan Jürjens - 2002 - Synthese 133 (1-2):131-158.
Age preferences in Mates: An even closer look, without the distorting lenses.Douglas T. Kenrick & Richard C. Keefe - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):140-143.
Data models and the acquisition and manipulation of data.Todd Harris - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.
A mismatch with dual process models of addiction rooted in psychology.Reinout W. Wiers, Remco Havermans, Roland Deutsch & Alan W. Stacy - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):460-460.
Neural models that convince: Model hierarchies and other strategies to bridge the gap between behavior and the brain.Martijn Meeter, Janneke Jehee & Jaap Murre - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):749 – 772.
Why the empirical literature fails to support or disconfirm modular or dual-process models.David Trafimow - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):283-284.
Minimal models vs. logic programming: the case of counterfactual conditionals.Katrin Schulz - 2014 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (1-2):153-168.
Combining psychological models with machine learning to better predict people’s decisions.Avi Rosenfeld, Inon Zuckerman, Amos Azaria & Sarit Kraus - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):81-93.
Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison.Laura Martignon & Ulrich Hoffrage - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (1):29-71.
Information modeling aspects of software development.Timothy R. Colburn - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):375-393.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-04-23
Downloads
6 (#1,105,473)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2016-04-23
Downloads
6 (#1,105,473)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Role of Imagination in Social Scientific Discovery: Why Machine Discoverers Will Need Imagination Algorithms.Michael Stuart - 2019 - In Mark Addis, Fernand Gobet & Peter Sozou (eds.), Scientific Discovery in the Social Sciences. Springer Verlag.
How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Us Understand Human Creativity.Fernand Gobet & Giovanni Sala - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
References found in this work
Automatic Generation of Cognitive Theories using Genetic Programming.Enrique Frias-Martinez & Fernand Gobet - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (3):287-309.