Demos (a)kurios? Agenda power and democratic control in ancient Greece

European Journal of Political Theory 22 (3):375-398 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ancient Greek elite theorists and ordinary democratic practitioners shared a distinctive account of the institutional features of democracy: democracy requires both institutions that empower ordinary citizens to decide matters and the widespread diffusion of agenda-setting powers. In the Politics, Aristotle makes agenda control central to his understanding of what it is to be kurios in the city, to his distinction between oligarchy and democracy, and to his analysis of the preconditions for democratic control of the polis. For democratic citizens, isēgoria (the equal right to speak and make proposals in the assembly) was more than an expression of the democratic commitment to equality. It was also an institutional tool to resist oligarchic domination of the agenda. Institutionalizing isēgoria was part of the Athenian response to a crucial problem for democratic theory and practice: how to ensure that popular participation reliably translates into popular control.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-22

Downloads
10 (#1,207,573)

6 months
5 (#837,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Landauer
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Null. Null - 2016 - Philosophy Study 6 (9).
The epistemology of democracy.Elizabeth Anderson - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):8-22.
The Athenian Constitution. Aristotle - 1952 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Penguin Books. Edited by P. J. Rhodes.
The Dēmos_ in _Dēmokratia.Daniela Cammack - 2019 - Classical Quarterly 69 (1):42-61.

View all 11 references / Add more references