Synthese 199 (3-4):10389-10413 (2021)

Authors
Pedro Merlussi
Universidade Federal do ABC
Fabio Lampert
University of Greifswald
Abstract
In a recent article, P. Roger Turner and Justin Capes argue that no one is, or ever was, even partly morally responsible for certain world-indexed truths. Here we present our reasons for thinking that their argument is unsound: It depends on the premise that possible worlds are maximally consistent states of affairs, which is, under plausible assumptions concerning states of affairs, demonstrably false. Our argument to show this is based on Bertrand Russell’s original ‘paradox of propositions’. We should then opt for a different approach to explain world-indexed truths whose upshot is that we may be morally responsible for some of them. The result to the effect that there are no maximally consistent states of affairs is independently interesting though, since this notion motivates an account of the nature of possible worlds in the metaphysics of modality. We also register in this article, independently of our response to Turner and Capes, and in the spirit of Russell’s aforementioned paradox and many other versions thereof, a proof of the claim that there is no set of all true propositions one can render false.
Keywords free will  Moral Responsibility  Possible Worlds  Incompatibilism  States of Affairs  Paradox of Propositions  Direct Argument  Consequence Argument  Propositions  Paradox  Determinism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-021-03252-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Wiley-Blackwell.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Situations and Attitudes.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Cambridge, England: Allen & Unwin.

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Revisiting McKay and Johnson's Counterexample to Beta.Pedro Merlussi - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations:1-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Transferring Non-Responsibility.Pedro Merlussi & Gabriel de Andrade Maruchi - 2019 - [email protected]: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 18 (3):285-298.
Sets and Worlds Again.Christopher Menzel - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):304-309.
Modality and Paradox.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (4):284-300.
The Ontology of Impossible Worlds.David A. Vander Laan - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):597-620.
Anti-Realism and Epistemic Accessibility.C. S. Jenkins - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (3):525-551.
Against Logical Versions of the Direct Argument: A New Counterexample.Seth Shabo - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (3):239-252.
Defending Existentialism?Marian David - 2009 - In M. Reicher (ed.), States of Affairs. Ontos Verlag. pp. 167--209.
Incompatibilism and the Transfer of Non-Responsibility.Justin Capes - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1477-1495.
Responsibility for Necessities.Stephen Kearns - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):307-324.
Russell's Paradox of the Totality of Propositions.Nino B. Cocchiarella - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (1):25-37.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-03

Total views
175 ( #66,114 of 2,499,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #14,267 of 2,499,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes