- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Moral Principles and Nuclear Weapons
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (1984)
Abstract
To find more information about Rowman and Littlefield titles, please visit www.rowmanlittlefield.comAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Disarming nuclear apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Lackey on Nuclear Deterrence: A Public Policy Critique or Applied Ethics Analysis?:Moral Principles and Nuclear Weapons. Douglas P. Lackey.Avner Cohen - 1987 - Ethics 97 (2):457-.
Nuclear weapons and medicine: some ethical dilemmas.A. Haines, C. de B. White & J. Gleisner - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (4):200-206.
Nuclear weapons and the ultimate environmental crisis.Michael Allen Fox - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (2):159-179.
Book Review:Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons. Steven Lee. [REVIEW]Douglas P. Lackey - 1994 - Ethics 105 (1):196-.
A Say in the End of the World: Morals and British Nuclear Weapons Policy, 1941-1987.Roger Ruston - 1989 - Clarendon Press.
Joseph Rotblat and the moral responsibilities of the scientist.Martin Clifford Underwood - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):129-134.
The Bane of “inhumane” weapons and overkill: An overview of increasingly lethal arms and the inadequacy of regulatory controls.Jacques G. Richardson - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):667-692.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-06
Downloads
18 (#831,783)
6 months
2 (#1,196,523)
2014-02-06
Downloads
18 (#831,783)
6 months
2 (#1,196,523)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The only ethical argument for positive δ? Partiality and pure time preference.Andreas Mogensen - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (9):2731-2750.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo