Gender partnership and tolerance phenomenon

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 15:73-81 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose. The article analyzes the role of such a phenomenon as tolerance in a partnership between a man and a woman, emphasizing its importance and necessity in their relations. The purpose of the study is to estimate the role of the tolerance phenomenon in the process of gender partnership. Theoretical basis. The works of domestic and foreign scientists contributed to estimate the function of tolerance during communication, cooperation and co-creation. In this paper the methodology of E. Fromm and N. Khamitov’s metaanthropology is used. Originality. It was proved that the success of a gender partnership depends on how tolerant its participants are to each other. Besides this, it has been established that tolerance is the main criterion for gender partnership. The idea of tolerance is considered as the way to fruitful development of human relations. For the first time it has been determined that gender partnership can be manifested on the ordinary, frontier and metafrontier levels of human existence. Tolerance has its own specifics and a manifestation on each of them. Conclusions. Metaanthropology has helped to estimate the role of tolerance among men and women in the partnership process. So, it can be stated that tolerance is a basis for gender partnership that harmonizes the relationship among a man and a woman and makes them egalitarian. Only on the metafrontier level of human being tolerance can be manifestation of individual integrity. Sincere, open interaction and creative work with Other are formed on this foundation. Thus, gender partnership with inexhaustible, complementary potential is the vector of development of human relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gender strategies and political leadership.N. V. Khamitov & D. D. Dandekar - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 15:40-48.
Acknowledging the Purpose of Partnership.Stuart Macdonald & Tom Chrisp - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):307-317.
Філософія освіти: Форми культуротворчості в історичному та індивідуальному бутті людини.Л. С Банах & І. А Ільчук - 2015 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 67:131-140.
Reflexii neortodoxe despre toleranta/ Unorthodox Thoughts on Tolerance.Camil Muresanu - 2002 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 1 (3):17-21.
Inquisitorial Tolerance.Peter A. Redpath - 1998 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1998 (113):170-172.
Loving Tolerance.Mohammad Hussein Ganji - 2019 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):55-64.
The Inclusion of the Other?Lasse Thomassen - 2006 - Political Theory 34 (4):439-462.
On Tolerance.van-Doan Tran - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (1):5-21.
Tolerance, Education and Hospitality: A Theological Proposal.Luke Bretherton - 2004 - Studies in Christian Ethics 17 (1):80-103.
A critique of pure tolerance.Robert Paul Wolff - 1965 - Boston,: Beacon Press. Edited by Barrington Moore & Herbert Marcuse.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-27

Downloads
15 (#947,381)

6 months
8 (#361,305)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Toleration.Michael Walzer - 1997 - Yale University Press.
On Toleration.Michael Walzer - 1997 - Yale University Press.

Add more references