Philosophers on Film From Bergson to Badiou: A Critical Reader

Columbia University Press (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The book consists of 18 individual chapter sections that discuss primary texts on cinema and film by major European philosophers of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Through these mediating texts, Kul-Want argues that the conceptual approach of European philosophy to film lies in appreciating the aesthetic theories and legacy of the Enlightenment philosopher Kant. Methodologically the book utilises a diachronic method of inquiry, representing the ways in which Kant’s aesthetics informs subsequent philosophers’ unilateral claim that the experience of cinema and film is primarily affective and irreducible to the diegetic structuring of the film. The book employs an additional synchronic method, demonstrating how the irreducibility of cinema and film claimed by philosophers is thought through their own original developments of Kant’s legacy. Finally, as a consequence of the combination of the foregoing methods, the book provides a comprehensive conceptual map of the relationships and differences between the philosophers and philosophical ideas contained in the book. In summary the book develops a complex understanding of how to think the relationship of the disciplines of philosophy and film, whilst also respecting their ‘difference’; offering a multi-lateral conception of this relationship: philosophy of film, philosophy in film, as well as philosophy as film.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hugo Miinsterberg.Robert Sinnerbrink - 2009 - In Felicity Colman (ed.), Film, Theory and Philosophy: The Key Thinkers. Acumen Publishing. pp. 20-30.
Filmosophy/Film as Philosophy.Robert Sinnerbrink - 2019 - In Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa & Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Springer. pp. 513-539.
"The New World": Heideggerian or Humanist Cinema?Britt Harrison - 2020 - Aesthetic Investigations 3 (2):200-227.
Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides.Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.) - 2019 - New York: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics.
Film theory and philosophy.Richard Allen & Murray Smith (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Paul Bowman, ed. Rancière and Film. Reviewed by.Nina Belmonte - 2016 - Philosophy in Review 36 (2):50-53.
Film Art from the Analytic Perspective.Deborah Knight - 2019 - In Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa & Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Springer. pp. 357-379.
Race in Film.Lewis R. Gordon - 2019 - In Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa & Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Springer. pp. 677-697.
Inaugurating Philosophy of Film Without Theory.Craig Fox & Britt Harrison - 2020 - Aesthetic Investigations 3 (2):175-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-15

Downloads
6 (#1,458,635)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references