Comment on Campbell

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):382-385 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: This comment on Campbell argues that a good book could be made better if more critical judgment was displayed. Attempts to recover the complete past must be abandoned, and especially in the history of ideas, evaluative judgments about the worth of ideas must be made and the presuppositions of thought must be explored

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bruce Kuklick , "William J ames: Writings 1902-1910". [REVIEW]Ignas K. Skrupskelis - 1989 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 25 (1):78.
Bruce Kuklick, "Josiah Royce: An Intellectual Biography". [REVIEW]Jacquelyn Ann K. Kegley - 1976 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (1):77.
James Campbell Cornelis De Waal.Richard Hart - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2).
James Campbell , "Selected Writings of James Hayden Tufts". [REVIEW]Mark Mendell - 1993 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (2):264.
The Great Debate: Alexander Campbell vs. Robert Owen.Edward H. Madden & Dennis W. Madden - 1982 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (3):207 - 226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#100,421)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references