Background knowledge and the structuralist approach: Reply to Jaap Kamps

Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):338-342 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Analyzing a priori knowledge.Albert Casullo - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):77 - 90.
Inductive rules, background knowledge, and skepticism.Daniel Steel & S. Kedzie Hall - unknown
The non-standard approach to confirmation and the ravens paradoxes: Reply to Patrick Maher.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):109-128.
Who's afraid of background independence?Dean Rickles - 2008 - In Dennis Geert Bernardus Johan Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime II. Elsevier. pp. 133--52.
Meaning and testability in the structuralist theory of science.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (1):47 - 76.
The ubiquity of background knowledge.Jaap Kamps - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):317-337.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#832,589)

6 months
1 (#1,471,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references