Authors
Daniel Kuby
Universität Konstanz
Abstract
Paul Feyerabend once made a remark to the effect that his pragmatic theory of observation can be traced back to proposals put forward by leading Logical Empiricists during the height of the protocol sentence debate. In this paper I want to vindicate the systematic side of Feyerabend’s remark and show that a pragmatic theory of observation can in fact be found in Rudolf Carnap’s writings of 1932. I first proceed to dispel a misunderstanding concerning the term “pragmatic” raised by Thomas Oberdan. Following Morris’ and Carnap’s documented usage, I show that the intended meaning of “pragmatic” refers to a specific semiotic relation between users of a language and their environment describable by empirical means. I reconstruct such a pragmatic theory in terms of a detector model that interprets observation sentences as bodily dispositions indicating physical events in the surroundings of the detector. I then proceed to show how Feyerabend’s later theory of observation picks up central features of Carnap’s account and also shares some of the motivations. I conclude by noting how an empirical theory of observation sentences offers a bootstrapping solution to the “basis problem”.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/698695
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 49 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Paul Feyerabend.John Preston - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Positivism and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation.Thomas Oberdan - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:25 - 37.
Feyerabend and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation.Robert E. Butts - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (4):383-394.
Logicism, Pragmatism, and Metascience: Towards a Pancritical Pragmatic Theory of Meta-Level Discourse.G. S. Axtell - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:39 - 49.
Feyerabend's Pragmatic Theory of Observation and the Comparability of Alternative Theories.Burke Townsend - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970:202 - 211.
On the Theoretical Dependence of Correspondence Postulates.James Child - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):170-177.
Carnap and Incommensurability.Stathis Psillos - 2008 - Philosophical Inquiry 30 (1-2):135-156.
Carnap and Theory of Knowledge.Dr M. Dashtbozorgi - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 21.
Carnap’s Logic of Science and Reference to the Present Moment.Florian Fischer - 2016 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):61-90.
III. Yates on Feyerabend's Democratic Relativism.C. Fred Alford - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):113 – 118.
II. More on Democratic Relativism: A Response to Alford.Steven Yates - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):450-453.
Farewell to Feyerabend.Harvey Siegel - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):343 – 369.
Pragmatic Unification, Observation and Realism in Astroparticle Physics.Brigitte Falkenburg - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):327-345.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-09

Total views
36 ( #305,551 of 2,461,941 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,036 of 2,461,941 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes