No Fool’s Red? Some Considerations on the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Peacocke on red and red.Michael A. Smith - 1986 - Synthese 68 (September):559-576.
The primary-secondary quality distinction.Edward Wilson Averill - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (July):343-362.
Locke on primary and secondary qualities.Samuel C. Rickless - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):297-319.
Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Distinction.Steven Nadler - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):47-61.
Mechanism, resemblance and secondary qualities: From Descartes to Locke.Keith Allen - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):273 – 291.
Of primary and secondary qualities.A. D. Smith - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):221-254.
Primary and secondary qualities: A return to fundamentals.David Novitz - 1975 - Philosophical Papers 4 (October):89-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saul Kripke
Last affiliation: CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references