Information in propositional proofs and algorithmic proof search

Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (2):852-869 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We study from the proof complexity perspective the proof search problem : •Is there an optimal way to search for propositional proofs?We note that, as a consequence of Levin’s universal search, for any fixed proof system there exists a time-optimal proof search algorithm. Using classical proof complexity results about reflection principles we prove that a time-optimal proof search algorithm exists without restricting proof systems iff a p-optimal proof system exists.To characterize precisely the time proof search algorithms need for individual formulas we introduce a new proof complexity measure based on algorithmic information concepts. In particular, to a proof system P we attach information-efficiency function $i_P$ assigning to a tautology a natural number, and we show that: • $i_P$ characterizes time any P-proof search algorithm has to use on $\tau $,•for a fixed P there is such an information-optimal algorithm,•a proof system is information-efficiency optimal iff it is p-optimal,•for non-automatizable systems P there are formulas $\tau $ with short proofs but having large information measure $i_P$.We isolate and motivate the problem to establish unconditional super-logarithmic lower bounds for $i_P$ where no super-polynomial size lower bounds are known. We also point out connections of the new measure with some topics in proof complexity other than proof search.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Existence of Strong Proof Complexity Generators.Jan Krajíček - 2024 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):20-40.
The cost of a cycle is a square.A. Carbone - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):35-60.
Propositional consistency proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):3-29.
On me number of steps in proofs.Jan Krajíèek - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 41 (2):153-178.
On the number of steps in proofs.Jan Kraj\mIček - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 41 (2):153-178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-02

Downloads
4 (#1,013,551)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?