The cost of a cycle is a square

Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):35-60 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The logical flow graphs of sequent calculus proofs might contain oriented cycles. For the predicate calculus the elimination of cycles might be non-elementary and this was shown in [Car96]. For the propositional calculus, we prove that if a proof of k lines contains n cycles then there exists an acyclic proof with O(k n+l ) lines. In particular, there is a polynomial time algorithm which eliminates cycles from a proof. These results are motivated by the search for general methods on proving lower bounds on proof size and by the design of more efficient heuristic algorithms for proof search

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#379,234)

6 months
17 (#141,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proof Theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (1):160-161.
The undecidability of k-provability.Samuel R. Buss - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 53 (1):75-102.
Duplication of directed graphs and exponential blow up of proofs.A. Carbone - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 100 (1-3):1-67.
Some remarks on lengths of propositional proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1995 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 34 (6):377-394.

View all 8 references / Add more references