- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
In defense of legal positivism: law without trimmings
New York: Oxford University Press (1999)
Abstract
This book is an uncompromising defense of legal positivism that insists on the separability of law and morality. After distinguishing among three facets of morality, Kramer explores a variety of ways in which law has been perceived as integrally connected to each of those facets. The book concludes with a detailed discussion of the obligation to obey the law--a discussion that highlights the strengths of legal positivism in the domain of political philosophy as much as in the domain of jurisprudence.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law without Trimmings.Matthew Kramer - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):422-425.
On the Separability of Law and Morality.Matthew Kramer - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 17 (2):315-335.
The unity of law and morality: a refutation of legal positivism.Michael J. Detmold - 1984 - Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
The authority of law: essays on law and morality.Joseph Raz - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Dogmas and Distortions: Legal Positivism Defended.Matthew H. Kramer - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (4):673-701.
Hans J. Morgenthau’s Critique of Legal Positivism: Politics, Justice, and Ethics in International Law.Carmen Chas - 2023 - Jus Cogens 5 (1):59-84.
Law as a moral judgment.Deryck Beyleveld - 1986 - London: Sweet & Maxwell. Edited by Roger Brownsword.
About morality and the nature of law.Joseph Raz - 2003 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (1):1-15.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
16 (#935,433)
6 months
157 (#23,535)
2009-01-28
Downloads
16 (#935,433)
6 months
157 (#23,535)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Attitude and Social Rules, or Why It's Okay to Slurp Your Soup.Jeffrey Kaplan - 2021 - Philosophers' Imprint 21 (28).
Was Austin right after all? On the role of sanctions in a theory of law.Frederick Schauer - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (1):1-21.
Regulative Rules: A Distinctive Normative Kind.Reiland Indrek - 2024 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 108 (3):772-791.
Dworkin's Theoretical Disagreement Argument.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (1):1-9.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-zhzfn uwo