In What Sense is Kantian Principle of Contradiction Non-classical?

Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (3):251-274 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the ground of Kant’s reformulation of the principle of con- tradiction, a non-classical logic KC and its extension KC+ are constructed. In KC and KC+, \neg(\phi \wedge \neg\phi),  \phi \rightarrow (\neg\phi \rightarrow \phi), and  \phi \vee \neg\phi are not valid due to specific changes in the meaning of connectives and quantifiers, although there is the explosion of derivable consequences from {\phi, ¬\phi} (the deduc- tion theorem lacking). KC and KC+ are interpreted as fragments of an S5-based first-order modal logic M. The quantification in M is combined with a “subject abstraction” device, which excepts predicate letters from the scope of modal operators. Derivability is defined by an appropriate labelled tableau system rules. Informally, KC is mainly ontologically motivated (in contrast, for example, to Jaśkowski’s discussive logic), relativizing state of affairs with respect to conditions such as time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-06

Downloads
144 (#129,590)

6 months
28 (#108,874)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Srećko Kovač
Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb

Citations of this work

Does Logic Have a History at All?Jens Lemanski - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-23.
Logical Foundations and Kant's Principles of Formal Logic.Srećko Kovač - 2020 - History and Philosophy of Logic 41 (1):48-70.
Modal collapse in Gödel's ontological proof.Srećko Kovač - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--323.
Forms of Judgment as a Link between Mind and the Concepts of Substance and Cause.Srećko Kovač - 2014 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski & Marek Rosiak (eds.), Substantiality and Causality. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 51-66.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations