Synthese 198 (3):2355-2374 (2019)

Authors
Karen Kovaka
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Social scientists have offered a number of explanations for why Americans commonly deny that human-caused climate change is real. In this paper, I argue that these explanations neglect an important group of climate change deniers: those who say they are on the side of science while also rejecting what they know most climate scientists accept. I then develop a “nature of science” hypothesis that does account for this group of deniers. According to this hypothesis, people have serious misconceptions about what scientific inquiry ought to look like. Their misconceptions interact with partisan biases to produce denial of human-caused climate change. After I develop this hypothesis, I propose ways of confirming that it is true. Then I consider its implications for efforts to combat climate change denial and for other cases of public rejection of science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02210-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Idealization and the Aims of Science.Angela Potochnik - 2017 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science.Kevin C. Elliott - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-14.
How to balance Balanced Reporting and Reliable Reporting.Mikkel Gerken - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (10):3117-3142.
Transparency and Secrecy in Citizen Science: Lessons From Herping.Aleta Quinn - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 85:208-217.
The Value-Ladenness of Transparency in Science: Lessons From Lyme Disease.Kevin C. Elliott - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88:1-9.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Climate Projections and Uncertainty Communication.Susan L. Joslyn & Jared E. LeClerc - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):222-241.
Climate Change and Ethics.Tim Hayward - 2012 - Nature Climate Change 2:843–848.
Individual Responsibility for Climate Change.Melany Banks - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):42-66.
How Does Moral Nihilism Affect Our Taking Action Against Climate Change?Thomas Pölzler - 2013 - Proceedings of the 13. International Conference of ISSEI.
Global Justice and Global Climate Change: A Discussion of the Relationship.Duane Windsor - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:23-34.
Cosmopolitan Climates.Mike Hulme - 2010 - Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2-3):267-276.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-23

Total views
97 ( #114,400 of 2,462,534 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #29,966 of 2,462,534 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes