Are Genes Intellectual Property?

In Michael Boylan (ed.), Who Owns You? Wiley. pp. 101–118 (2015-03-19)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

US law has until recently treated unmodified and merely “isolated” genes as a form of intellectual property. Patents protect processes, methods, manufactures, and compositions of matter. Legal theorists and intellectual property scholars have similarly weighed in on the patentability of genes, often uncritical of the strained lines of reasoning that made first “isolated and purified” products of nature patentable, or simply weighing the costs vs. benefits. In the early fifteenth century, the first robust institutionalized forms of intellectual property protection emerged in Europe. This chapter examines the theory of intellectual property implicit in its historical development and looks more closely at the question of whether genes belong to the general category “intellectual property.” The purpose of intellectual property law is to encourage innovation, to discourage secret‐keeping, and to move new knowledge into the public domain after a period of time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

DNA and The Commons.David Koepsell - 2015-03-19 - In Michael Boylan (ed.), Who Owns You? Wiley. pp. 119–136.
Constructing Intellectual Property.Alexandra George - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Intellectual Property.Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 2007 - In Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit & Thomas Pogge (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 653–668.
Is It Ethical To Patent Human Genes?Annabelle Lever - 2008 - In Gosseries Axel, Marciano A. & Strowel A. (eds.), Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Basingstoke & N.Y.: Palgrave Mcmillan. pp. 246--64.
Intellectual Property.Matthias Leistner & Stefan Koroch - 2019 - In Ludger Kühnhardt & Tilman Mayer (eds.), The Bonn Handbook of Globality: Volume 1. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 607-619.
A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property.D. B. Resnik - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):319-335.
On the Value of the Intellectual Commons.James Wilson - 2012 - In New Frontiers in the Philosophy of Intellectual Property.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
5 (#1,531,351)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Koepsell
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references