The role of directive moral teaching: Reply to Michael Hand’s ‘Moral education in the community of inquiry’

Journal of Philosophy in Schools 7 (2) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary on Michael Hand’s paper ’Moral education in the community of inquiry’, I argue that Hand is right to call for the Community of Inquiry method to include directive moral teaching. I do so in the light of having worked with this broader conception, or something very like it, in the writing of the NSW Primary Ethics Curriculum. Using examples from this curriculum, I aim to show the necessity of a broader Col, and to argue for a process that involves even more direction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inquiry without standards: A reply to Hand.Laurance J. Splitter - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy in Schools 7 (2).
Moral education in the community of inquiry.Michael Hand - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy in Schools 7 (2).
Direction in a community of ethical inquiry.Tim Sprod - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy in Schools 7 (2).
Directive teaching in the community of moral inquiry.Philip Cam - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy in Schools 7 (2).
Philosophy for Children, Values Education and the Inquiring Society.Philip Cam - 2014 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (11):1203-1211.
Editorial.Laura D'Olimpio & Andrew Peterson - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy in Schools 7 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-08

Downloads
25 (#621,889)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references