Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (1):37-60 (2017)

Authors
Markus Kneer
University of Zürich
Dan Zeman
University of Warsaw
Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country
Abstract
In this paper we discuss a phenomenon we call perspectival plurality, which has gone largely unnoticed in the current debate between relativism and contextualism about predicates of personal taste. According to perspectival plurality, the truth value of a sentence containing more than one PPT may depend on more than one perspective. Prima facie, the phenomenon engenders a problem for relativism and can be shaped into an argument in favor of contextualism. We explore the consequences of perspectival plurality in depth and assess several possible responses on behalf of advocates of relativism.
Keywords Predicates of personal taste  Relativism  Contextualism  Perpsectival plurality  The operator argument  The binding argument  Paraphrasing strategy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10988-016-9198-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Knowledge and Practical Interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne - 2009 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Direction Effect on Taste Predicates.Alexander Dinges & Julia Zakkou - 2020 - Philosophers' Imprint 20 (27):1-22.
Predicates of Personal Taste: Empirical Data.Markus Kneer - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6455-6471.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Relativism and Ethical Competence.Jaromír Feber & Jelena Petrucijová - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (1-2):73-86.
Context, Content, and Relativism.Michael Glanzberg - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (1):1--29.
Assertoric Force Perspectivalism: Relativism Without Relative Truth.Lionel Shapiro - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1.
The Evidence for Relativism.Max Kölbel - 2009 - Synthese 166 (2):375-395.
Binding, Genericity, and Predicates of Personal Taste.Eric Snyder - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (2-3):278-306.
In Defence of a Perspectival Semantics for 'Know'.Berit Brogaard - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):439 – 459.
Relativism and Predicates of Personal Taste.Barry C. Smith - 2010 - In Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds.), Context-depenece, Perspective and Relativity. De Gruyer Mouton.
Varieties of Disagreement and Predicates of Taste.Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):167-181.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-12-17

Total views
553 ( #15,226 of 2,499,250 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #27,420 of 2,499,250 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes