The Quinean ‘Pressing from Above’ Argument

Philosophy Research Archives 5:647-659 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I show that what Quine calls 'pressing from above' is an argument for indeterminacy of translation that is generated by assuming the partial interpretation view of scientific theories. Furthermore, I argue that Quine's thesis should be understood as a reductio ad absurdum of partial interpretation and/or the view that the meaning of a term determines a unique extension for the term.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indeterminacy of Translation.Alan Weir - 2006 - In Ernest LePore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Some Quinean Arguments for Quine's Central Doctrines.Daniel Louis Galperin - 1994 - Dissertation, University of California, Riverside
Meaning Scepticism.Alexander Miller - 2006 - In Michael Devitt & Richard Hanley (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 91–113.
Meaning, Grammar, and Indeterminacy.Stephen Neale - 1987 - Dialectica 41 (4):301-319.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
18 (#826,262)

6 months
4 (#1,004,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references