Covid-19: equal response and unequal interests

Mind and Society 20 (2):189-193 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The greatest risks of Covid-19 are not arising from its direct effects on morbidity and mortality but from exaggerated aspirations to control such effects politically. A swift transformation from an epidemic to an endemic state of affairs may in case of a disease with comparatively low and unequally distributed mortality like covid-19 be an option, too. This needs to be laid out but it is not the task of science to plead for this or any other option.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Case for Human Challenge Trials in COVID-19.George P. Drewett - 2024 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 21 (1):151-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-20

Downloads
6 (#1,480,465)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Behemoth or the Long Parliament.Thomas Hobbes - 1990 - University of Chicago Press.
Behemoth or the long parliament.Th Hobbes & H. Tönnies - 1890 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 29:323-323.

Add more references