Ancilla theologiae vs. domina philosophorum: St. Thomas Aquinas, latin averroism and the autonomy of philosophy

Abstract

ex opposito, any methodological doctrine that separates theological dogma from philosophical inquiry increases the autonomy of philosophical inquiry. But the Latin Averroist methodological doctrine of veritas duplex (rather improperly, but not entirely unreasonably called so) separated theological dogma from philosophical inquiry. Therefore, the Latin Averroist methodological doctrine of veritas duplex increased the autonomy of philosophical inquiry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

St. Thomas and Philosophy. [REVIEW]S. V. T. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):590-590.
O’Callaghan on Verbum Mentis in Aquinas.James C. Doig - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):233-255.
Autonomy and Sympathy.Anastasia Marinopoulou - 2011 - Philosophical Inquiry 34 (1-2):107-108.
Sensory intuition and the dogma of localization.Reinhardt Grossmann - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):238 – 251.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#283,105)

6 months
55 (#95,680)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gyula Klima
Fordham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references