Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Botanist: Edgar Anderson Prepares the 1941 Jesup Lectures with Ernst Mayr [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Biology 46 (1):73-101 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The correspondence between Edgar Anderson and Ernst Mayr leading into their 1941 Jesup Lectures on “Systematics and the Origin of Species” addressed population thinking, the nature of species, the relationship of microevolution to macroevolution, and the evolutionary dynamics of plants and animals, all central issues in what came to be known as the Evolutionary Synthesis. On some points, they found ready agreement; for others they forged only a short term consensus. They brought two different working styles to this project reflecting their different appreciations of what was possible at this point in evolutionary studies. For Mayr, it was a focused project with definitive short term conclusions imminent while Anderson viewed it as an episode in an ongoing historical process that, while exciting and suggestive, remained openended. Thus, Mayr and Anderson represent two distinct perspectives on the Evolutionary Synthesis in formation; by understanding both of their points of view, we can grasp more fully the state of evolutionary theory at this key moment

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the origin of the typological/population distinction in Ernst Mayr's changing views of species, 1942-1959.Carl Chung - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):277-296.
The why and how of species.Ernst Mayr - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (4):431-441.
On the failure of modern species concepts.Jody Hey - 2006 - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (8):447-450.
Epistemic and community transition in american evolutionary studies: The 'committee on common problems of genetics, paleontology, and systematics' (1942-1949). [REVIEW]Joe Cain - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (2):283-313.
The Modern Synthesis and Lewontin's Critique of Sociobiology.I. I. I. Holcomb - 1988 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 10 (2):315 - 341.
The Rhetoric of Evolutionary Theory.David J. Depew - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (4):380-389.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
42 (#373,183)

6 months
3 (#987,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Genera, evolution, and botanists in 1940: Edgar Anderson's “Survey of Modern Opinion”.Kim Kleinman - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 67:1-7.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Material Basis of Evolution.Richard Goldschmidt - 1941 - Philosophy of Science 8 (3):394-395.
Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies.Joe Cain - 2009 - Journal of the History of Biology 42 (4):621 - 648.
R. A. Fisher and his advocacy of randomization.Nancy S. Hall - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):295-325.

View all 6 references / Add more references