Secondary Causality and Defective Choices

Ethics and Medics 47 (5):1-2 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Church teaching is often difficult to digest for those unfamiliar with its nuances. In particular, teachings related to IVF are seen as insensitive to those who were conceived and born as a result of the process. In this article, Rev. Kizewski explains the difference between primary and secondary causality, as well as defective choices and their results. In short, Catholic teaching on the illicit nature of the processes involved in IVF should in no way be taken as a condemnation of individuals conceived during those processes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Addition and Subtraction.Cara Buskmiller - 2022 - Ethics and Medics 47 (2):3-4.
IVF and Social Justice.Donald T. DeMarco - 1988 - Ethics and Medics 13 (7):1-2.
IVF and the Conjugal Act.Stephen Napier - 2007 - Ethics and Medics 32 (4):1-2.
Medical and Ethical Concerns over IVF.Tara L. Seyfer - 2003 - Ethics and Medics 28 (8):1-3.
Pastoral care for children conceived through IVF.Joseph Parkinson - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 18 (1):1.
The Care of Defective Children.Gary M. Atkinson - 1979 - Ethics and Medics 4 (1):3-4.
Catholic Principles and In Vitro Fertilization.Kevin D. O’Rourke - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (4):709-722.
Mainstream Media and Catholic Principles.Tim Millea - 2022 - Ethics and Medics 47 (6):3-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-20

Downloads
5 (#1,559,732)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references