Elitism, Democracy, and Science Policy

In Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the perspective of well‐ordered science one can explore previous attempts to set science policy. This chapter considers three: Bacon's story of the New Atlantis, Vannevar Bush's Science: The Endless Frontier, and a recent attempt to make the National Institutes of Health more open to inputs from the public.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science, the Endless Frontier.Vannevar Bush - 2020 - Princeton University Press.
Science and Informed, Counterfactual, Democratic Consent.Arnon Keren - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1284-1295.
The Relationship Between Science and Democracy on Philip Kitcher’s Perspectives.Moch Zihad Islami & Lailiy Muthmainnah - 2023 - Kanz Philosophia : A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 9 (2):263-292.
The Governance of «Well-Ordered Science», from Ideal Conversation to Public Debate.Maxence Gaillard - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (2):245-256.
Well‐Ordered Science.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - In Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Characterization of Epistemology in Philip Kitcher: A Critical Reflection from New Empiricism.Inmaculada Perdomo - 2012 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):113-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Kitcher
Columbia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references