Philosophy of Science 69 (4):560-568 (2002)
AbstractIn Science, Truth, and Democracy, Philip Kitcher develops the notion of well-ordered science: scientific inquiry whose research agenda and applications are subject to public control guided by democratic deliberation. Kitcher's primary departure from his earlier views involves rejecting the idea that there is any single standard of scientific significance. The context-dependence of scientific significance opens up many normative issues to philosophical investigation and to resolution through democratic processes. Although some readers will feel Kitcher has not moved far enough from earlier epistemological positions, the book does represent an important addition to literature on science, society, and values.
Similar books and articles
Genuine Problems and the Significance of Science.Matthew J. Brown - 2010 - Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):131-153.
Naturalizing or Demythologizing Scientific Inquiry: Kitcher's: Science, Truth and Democracy.William A. Rottschaefer - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3):408-422.
A Euthyphronic Problem for Kitcher’s Epistemology of Science.Jeffrey W. Roland - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):205-223.
Science, Truth, and Democracy. [REVIEW]M. Ruse - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):280 – 281.
Science and Values and Values in Science: Comments on Philip Kitcher's Science, Truth, and Democracy.John Dupré - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (5):505 – 514.
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth, and Democracy:Science, Truth, and Democracy.Daniel M. Hausman - 2003 - Ethics 113 (2):423-428.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Lessons From the Vioxx Debacle: What the Privatization of Science Can Teach Us About Social Epistemology.Justin Biddle - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):21 – 39.
A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.Barbara E. Ribeiro, Robert D. J. Smith & Kate Millar - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):81-103.
Feyerabend’s Well-Ordered Science: How an Anarchist Distributes Funds.Jamie Shaw - 2018 - Synthese 198 (1):419-449.
Well-Ordered Science’s Basic Problem.Cristian Larroulet Philippi - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (2):365-375.
Self-Correction in Science: Meta-Analysis, Bias and Social Structure.Justin P. Bruner & Bennett Holman - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78:93-97.
References found in this work
The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions.Philip Kitcher - 1993 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding.Hugh Lacey - 1999 - Routledge.